Aviation Management Systems

Resulting in ………

Better risk management a reduced insurance premiums a increased profits
Enhanced company reputation a increasing load-factors a increased profits
Continuous improvement a increasing efficiency a increasing yields a increased profits

But, can I afford it …….?

Experience shows that the direct cost of QS implementation is about 1% of turnover. Such costs, like any other infrastructural upgrading, should anyway be treated as a Capital Cost (not a running cost) with its depreciation spread over a number of years. The cost burden can thus be significantly reduced and will anyway be absorbed by an almost immediate increase in company profitability.

Can I afford to be without it …….?

As such, Quality Systems (QS) are the foundation on which recovery plans / business plans should be built, offering users their best chance of success.

In aviation, as in any industry, when in financial trouble, there is a tendency for companies to put improvement plans to one side "until we are over this bad patch". Similarly in new-start airlines quality system implementation is usually only a consideration "once we are up and running”. Wrong………!

This clearly need not be the case for, as demonstrated below, quality is the optimum tool for recovery of a run-down business and for success in a new-start. As such, it is the foundation of a business not a refinement.

QUALITY SYSTEMS

A Tool for Commercial Survival and Success

Achieving ……...

Optimization of use of workforce
Elimination of waste
Systemization of working methodology – iliminates variations
Optimization of documentation and records
Transparency of process
Improvements in flight safety
Continuous improvement process